Are Multiple Process Improvement Frameworks Better Than One?

I've always been perplexed by the various processapply them in the right way."
improvement frameworks floating around the businessIn his book, Harris uses an analogy of three Russian
world. There's Six Sigma, Lean, balanced scorecard,nesting dolls. The outer doll is COBIT, which provides a
COBIT, ITIL. And that's only a few of them. There is aframework for governance and control of IT providers.
mind-boggling list.The middle doll is ITIL, which focuses on best practices
When a new framework is introduced, my firstfor IT operations.The inner doll is CMMI, which focuses
question is always, "Do we really need another?" So iton best practices for systems and software
was in February when I interviewed Sheila Upton,development. The doll analogy is employed to illustrate
director of Technology and Security Risk Services forthe day-to-day involvement the business can expect
Ernst & Young and a member of the Innovationto have with each framework, explained Harris.
Value Institute, when the IVI introduced the IT CapabilityBusiness will be most involved with COBIT, somewhat
Maturity Framework (IT-CMF), a five-stage maturityless so with ITIL, and probably far less so with CMMI.
model used to organize and structure a frameworkSaid Harris:
for mapping IT improvement efforts. I followed up aBoth ITIL and CMMI are both IT-oriented best practices.
few weeks later with a blog post in which I askedCOBIT is a business-oriented best practice. So COBIT
(rhetorically) Can ITIL Do It All? The answer, of course,is about the control the business should expect to
was no.have in place regarding IT. The strength and weakness
During a series of interviews I did for a story on ITIL,of COBIT is it really only defines control points and
Bob Mathers, a principal consultant for Compassessentially generates the climate to report and audit
Management Consulting, told me many organizationsinformation at those control points. So it's perfect for
integrate ITIL (IT Infrastucture Library) with othermonitoring information for IT governance. But it doesn't
improvement frameworks such as COBIT (Controlreally contain any best practices. So that's why I talk
Objectives for Information and Related Technology).about the three. And getting back to the Russian dolls,
"That came out of their realization that ITIL wasn'tthat's why I believe they should be in that order. The
necessarily going to solve everything they thought itbusiness should expect to control IT through a
might solve," he told me.COBIT-like structure and at the same they should do
Using multiple frameworks is an approach advocatedthose check boxes that say "Are you following ITIL
by Mike Harris, owner and president of Davidpractices?"and "Are you following CMMI practices?"
Consulting Group and one of three authors of a newHarris suggests that some organizations may also
book titled "The Business Value of IT: Managing Risks,want to consider Six Sigma. The pro: If the business is
Optimizing Performance and Measuring Results," in myalready using it, employing the same approach in IT
recent interview with him. Specifically, he believes mostcould help reinforce corporate culture and strengthen
organizations will derive value from implementing threeIT/business relations. The con: If the IT organization isn't
popular improvement methodologies: ITIL, COBIT andmature enough, "the focusing effect of Six Sigma may
CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration). The trick,leave too many IT capability gaps," writes Harris in his
he said, is to "take the strengths of each one and tobook.