Are There Holes in Your SOX? (Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance for Public and Private Companies)

Summary:- SOX Section 404: Financial spreadsheets and
The illicit transgressions by Enron and those alike in thereports must be safeguarded from being falsified or
late 1990s, lead to regulations created to standardizeaccidentally or deliberately redistributed.
the trustworthiness of financial institutions and public- SOX Section 409: Real time disclosure of material
companies. Companies facing SOX compliance willthat impacts the company's finances must be reported
need to consider the following: what are the bestwithin 48 hours
practice processes, how do these processes differ- SOX Section 802: Guarantees that documents and
from existing practices, how should new processes berecords are not altered
implemented, and how can short term processes be- SOX Section 1102: Corrupting, altering, mutilating,
balanced with longer "term strategic goals?"destroying or concealing records are violations. Those
A World Before SOX:found guilty of obstructing an investigation or official
The enterprise world had a rude awakening after aproceeding will face 20 years in prison and fines.
series of well-publicized corporate financial scandals.The Sarbanes-Oxley Act focuses on corporate
Many stories of misappropriated corporate dollarsgovernance, accountability and the reporting practices
surfaced in the late 1990s involving the likes of Enron,of publicly held companies. Yet the act also impacts
Tyco and WorldCom. Legislation soon responded toprivate firms that one day might become public and
the multitude of gross transgressions committed bythose who do business with publicly traded companies.
the upper echelon management of the enterpriseWhat are the Holes in Your SOX Compliance?
world.While sharing information online is a convenient luxury
Offenses committed by these industry heads rangedof e-commerce, it also creates a great vulnerability as
from extravagant multi-million dollar trips to exoticinformation, data and correspondence are traded from
locals, large private gifts to spouses and shufflingbusiness to business. Data and email exchange can
company funds to bankroll other investments. Thepose both SOX compliance and privacy concerns.
corporate world needed to be held accountable for itsThis errant misuse of company information isn't
misdeeds. SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) or the Publicexclusive to U.S. companies. Staff at 18% of large UK
Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protectionfirms gained unauthorized access to information during
Act of 2002 came into fruition to improve corporate2005, the report says. Nine per cent of those large
governance and help police possible future misdeeds.firms saw staff misuse restricted information.(2)
The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires publicly tradedHow Can Your Firm Sew Up its SOX Holes?
entities to define, evaluate and document processesExecutive management seeking to be SOX compliant
which lead to senior management accountability. SOXmust have the fortitude and commitment to strategic
requires that audits or substantial verification controlsplanning and execution to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's
must be in place to ensure senior management is helddirectives. The firm's CEO, CFO, CCO/CRO and CIO
culpable for their financial actions.must cooperate and have demanding attention to
Why Should Privately Held Businesses Care Aboutdetail when establishing policies to be SOX compliant.
SOX?The need for creating and implementing strong
While SOX applies directly to publicly tradedelectronic data and email retention policies and
companies, those privately held businesses who wishcompliance in line with SOX has never been greater
to do business with businesses traded on places likethan in today's fluxing electronic business world.
the NASDQ must also become Sarbanes-OxleyEmail is not necessarily secure against interception.
compliant.Whether or not email is encrypted in transmission
Many large public corporations will simply refuse to dodepends on your software. It is therefore our policy
business with privately held companies who are notnot to send emails to you that contain identifiable
SOX compliant. Private firms who want to do businessinformation about you, your household, or business.
with large public entities are now also thrown into aAndy Purdy, acting director of the National Cyber
SOX compliant landscape .Security Division of the Department of Homeland
SOX affects a broad range of industries who "touch"Security in a 2006 interview with CNET identifies the
information of those traded firms, they include and areimportance in protecting a company's important digital
not limited to:assets:
- Attorneys"Small businesses and large enterprises and the
- Accountants and Auditing Firms who reviewgovernment are all important when trying to reduce
company financial statementsthe cyber-risk. We're trying to raise awareness with
- Brokers or dealers and their employeespartners of the responsibility and techniques
- Security companies handling electronic transactionsconsumers can use to help secure their systems..."(3)
- International businesses who operate in the UnitedBefore Sarbanes-Oxley, corporations saw a gross
Statesabuse of executive power at the cost of earnest
Acceptance of SOX by private companies is not angrowth in business. Today, stiff criminal and civil
issue, as "73% of private company CEOs said SOXpenalties for violations of securities law will be instituted
has done at least a decent job of improving financialagainst companies who do not meet SOX standards.
governance and transparency for public companies."(1)How can private firms flourish in today's email reliant
Who's Responsible for SOX Communicationarena, while being SOX compliant. Introducing strong
Compliance?compliance policies in line with SOX which include
SOX requires incoming and outgoing correspondencefirewalls, up-to-date virus protection, encryption and
be monitored. Depending on the business's structure,email anti-theft measures can help a business work
communication exchanges can be monitored by thecooperatively with publicly traded companies.
Chief Compliance Officers (CCOs) Chief InformationBenefits of Email Anti-Theft Sofware
Officers (CIOs) and Chief Risk Officers (CROs).Implementing email anti-theft allows a company to
These executives are responsible for the security,grow in credibility, reputation and trust; all factors which
accuracy and the reliability of the organization'slead to increased clientele and revenue.
reporting and messaging systems.With security measures to keep company
Well-groom organizations have policies set in place bycorrespondence as well as protect outbound email,
their high level primary officers outlining what sorts ofSMB firms can be both prudent with their technology
information may or many not be communicatedbudgets and well-armed with the tools and resources
outside a department and outside the organization.necessary to be industry compliant. Clients will feel
While these rules exist, firms often don't take themore secure about sharing their personal information
necessary steps to make sure employees within thewith compliant SBM offices, paving the way to better
organization understand these rules, and theirand safer communication.
importance.End Notes:
What are the Key Elements of SOX Which Relate to1.) Rob Preston "Time to Regulate the Regulations"
Electronic Data Storage and E-mail Security?Information Week, 27 February, 2006, 78.