Competency-Based Training - Teaching Employees to Problem-Solve Using the Competency Model

Every day, employees face challenges, problems andknowledge to solve specific workplace problems. The
opportunities.goal of PBT is to learn to solve problem by applying
- Typically, they require difficult decisions to be maderesources, policies and procedures to specific
within a short time span.workplace problems.
- Typically, they all hit at once.- Delivery of knowledge: Knowledge in the case study
- Typically, there is no right or wrong solution, butmethod is given to the employee first. It precedes the
multiple solutions requiring the skill of discerningcase study. In contrast, in PBT, the problem is
outcomes and implications in order to make the bestpresented prior to delivery of information needed to
decision.solve the problem. Knowledge is acquired as the
What if training was like that? What if training was likeemployee self-identifies the process, the resources,
the real world?and the best solution to the problem. The problem
What if competencies and behavioral skills werealways precedes the delivery of information.
learned using an application that challenged trainees to- Learning concept: In case studies, employees apply
apply those skills to situations that mimicked thewhat was taught to a problem or case study. In PBT,
employee's every day work environment?employees acquire the knowledge as they struggling
In this paper, a problem-based training approach (PBT)to identify resources and apply them to solve the
is offered that is distinguished from action learning orproblem.
case study learning. PBT engages employees through- Use of resources: In case study, resource materials
applying a different style of training. PBT is anare delivered in some format by instructor prior to
adaptation of the principals of problem-based learning,application stage. Employee then applies the resources
an adult learning methodology common in academicto the problem. In PBT, identification and use of
arenas.(See reference 1.) The uniqueness of PBT isresources is self-directed according to what the
found in the modification of the academic classroomemployees decide they need to know in order to solve
oriented learning methodology to the dynamic andthe problem.
diverse needs of corporate training.- Collaboration: Case studies may or may not involve
PBT meets conditions defined as optimal for adultcollaborative learning. PBT is usually a team process,
learning.(See reference 2.) In a training environment,although internet applications have allowed it to be an
these conditions would include:individualized training method too.
- Freedom of expression and an acceptance of- Direction: Case study is highly directed by an
differences.instructor. PBT is self-directed with a coach as a guide
- An environment where trainees perceive the goalsto ensure teams continue to refine their solutions until
of the learning experience to be their own goals.they attain a best practice solution.
- A culture where trainees accept a share of- Evaluation: In case study training, evaluation methods
responsibility for planning and operating the learningvary depending on the model. In almost all models, the
experience and therefore have a commitment to it.end result is what is used to assess learning. In PBT,
- A company where trainees participate actively andmultiple solutions are possible. Learning the process of
sense progress towards their own goals.problem-solving is more important than getting the best
How does PBT differ from other training models?practice solution.
In PBT, problems are created around specific learningAction Learning Contrasted with PBT
objectives written to measure select competenciesMany corporations are using a leadership training
and behavioral skills. Thus, employees not only learnprogram called Action Learning.(See reference 3.)
how to problem-solve, but learn competencies such asAlthough both these programs focus employees on
managing conflict, planning and organizing or developingreal world problems, there are unique features to each
talent.as shown in the table below.
Using simulations to teach is not unique to PBT. ThereSimilarities: Action Learning Contrasted to PBT
are several learning models that use problems within- Work is usually done as a team rather than
their curriculums. They include case study learningindividually.
where the material learned is applied to solve a- Employees are challenged to resolve real world
simulated problem, action learning where a problem isproblems.
presented to a select group of management trainees,- Encourages collaborative learning.
and problem-based training. A comparison of each of- Promotes global visioning: seeing the big picture and
these as well as a comparison of PBT to a traditionalimplications of decisions made.
learning approach may help clarify the uniqueness of- Promotes development of critical thinking skills.
the PBT method.- Promotes development of analytical skills.
Traditional Training Contrasted with PBTDifferences: Action Learning Contrasted to PBT
Similarities: Traditional Training to PBT- Goal: The goal of action learning is to develop a
- Employees develop knowledge required by their jobstrategic action plan. Typically this is business process
position.improvement oriented. In PBT, the goal is to learn to
- Employee gain familiarity with resources, policies andsolve problems by applying resources, policies &
procedures relevant to the job.procedures to a wide range of situations likely to be
Differences: Traditional Training to PBTencountered in the workplace.
- Process goal: The goal of traditional training is to- Focus: Action learning addresses large scale
teach employees the knowledge, policies andbusiness challenges. Typically problems are written to
procedures required for their job position. In PBT, thebe business process improvement oriented. The focus
goal is to learn to solve problems by applyingof PBT ranges from day-to-day problems typically
resources, policies & procedures to a wide rangeexperienced by entry level employees to large scale
of situations likely to be encountered in the workplace.problems faced by management.
- Delivery of knowledge: In traditional training classes,- Learning concept: In action learning, finding a best
information is given to the employee first, generallypractice solution to the problem is essential for
through a lecture, video, or e-learning module. Thecompletion of the task. In PBT, learning a
information always precedes quizzes or opportunitiesproblem-solving process that can be used with any
to apply their knowledge to work related situations. Inworkplace problem is more important than finding a
PBT, a problem is presented prior to delivery ofsolution to a specific problem.
information needed to solve the problem. Knowledge is- Participant selection: Action learning pulls together the
acquired as the employee self-identifies the process,top performing company individuals and/or potential
the resources, and the best solution to the problem.senior executives; most often individuals on the team
The problem always precedes the delivery ofstart out with similar levels of expertise although they
information.bring different backgrounds to the process. PBT
- Learning concept: in traditional training classed,works well at the management level, even when
employees apply what was taught. In PBT, employeesteams are from diverse background levels of
learn through struggling to solve problems.experience. The more experienced employees
- Collaboration. Collaboration is not a feature ofbecome a human resource for the less experienced
traditional training. Although use of teams is preferred inones. Not limited to management level. Has been
PBT, it is not required.applied to new and inexperienced employees hired in
- Use of resources: In traditional training classed, thestarting positions in retail sales.
resources or training content is delivered by the- Direction: Action learning is more highly directed by a
instructor. Employee then is tested to apply thatcoach than PBT.
content correctly. In PBT, identification and use ofIn conclusion, PBT teaches employees a
resources is self-directed according to what theproblem-solving process. This process can be applied
employees decide they need to know in order to solveto train employees on any competency or behavioral
the problem.skill. It empowers trainees by putting them in control of
- Direction: Traditional learning is directed by antheir learning process. It is challenging and messy. It is
instructor. The "learned expert" imparts knowledge tolike the real world, where answers are not right or
the novice trainees. The PBT process is self-directedwrong, but appear in shades of grey with complex
with a coach as a guide to ensure teams continue toimplications associated with each solution. Learning to
refine their solutions until they attain a best practiceanalyze problems and apply corporate policies and
solution.resources in order to identify the best solutions is a
- Evaluation: In traditional training, evaluation methodsnecessary skill for managers in today's fast-paced
vary. In PBT, multiple solutions are possible. Learning theworld. It's time that employees learn to problem-solve.
process of problem-solving is more important thanReferences:
getting the best practice solution.
Case Study Learning Contrasted with PBT1. Martin, F & Saljo, R. 1976. On qualitative
Similarities: Case Study to PBTdifferences in learning: I-Outcome and process, British
- Requires employees to tackle real world problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 46, pp 4-11.
- Places employees in problem-solving roles.2. Knowles, ME. 1980. The Modern Practice of Adult
- Develops critical thinking skills.Education, Cambridge/Prentice Hall.
- Develops analytical skills.3. Marquardt, M. 2004. Harnessing the Power of Action
Differences: Case Study Training Contrasted to PBTLearning, Training & Development Magazine, pp
- Process goal: The goal of case study is to apply26-32.