Culture in the Business Environment

Management Challenge- Only 20% of TQM initiatives met their quality
Organizations are judged on their financialobjectives and 40% were a complete flop
performance and therefore, by default so are their- A survey of senior managers who had been
management teams. The key for managers isinvolved in downsizing found that 74% indicated that
understanding how financial success is measured,productivity, morale and trust had since deteriorated
impacts on operational performance and options- A survey across 1742 companies in the USA and
available to make positive sustainable change.Europe found that 85% found little or no gain from their
effort in re-engineering processes.
Typically managers tend to think in two dimensionsAlternative Approach
when trying to address the problem. What do I need toSo if this problem exists you may wonder if there is an
change in my operations to achieve the desiredanswer to it. The answer is yes and it hides in plain
financial results? Timescales may be tight andsight.
sometimes the short term needs may outweigh theThe third dimension is the organization itself and its
long term aspirations. Sometimes short term measuresculture. The reason it hides in plain sight is that people
can damage the long term capabilities of anare generally aware of it but it is difficult to really
organization. This can become a vicious circle wheredefine, let alone do anything about it. We now have
the law of diminishing returns is compounded by theinstruments and methodologies that bring culture into
diminishing options available. If you look at the diagramfocus and allow organizations to do something about it.
link below you will see a dotted line defined as theAn organization's effectiveness will impact on its
Minor Loop where the financial demands of revenue,operational capability and consequently its financial
profit, cash flow and equity are served by changes inperformance. In bringing in the organization dimension it
operations of the business. This can be successful butadds a multitude of options and can provide a shot in
it is a path littered with hazards.the arm to the minor loop challenge described above.
Minor Loop EvidenceThe organization is generally the origin of the business
This is not simply an opinion it is backed by researchperformance but is often overlooked as the area
conducted by Cameron and Quinn who stated thatwhere true transformation can take place. The Major
the three most typical change initiatives conducted byLoop described on the diagram link below shows how
organizations in what could be described as Minorit can take place. It even provides benefits against the
Loop were:external issues that can plague operations and finance.
Major Loop Evidence
1. RestructuringIf you are still not convinced a ten year study by
2. Quality InitiativesKotter and Heskett found that organizations who
3. Process Initiativesactively managed their culture significantly
Of these at least 75% failed, stalled or did not achieveoutperformed those who did not. We would ask you
the desired benefits. A summary of their findings isto look at the main findings below and consider what
below.those findings might mean for your organization.