Future Of Six Sigma -- Different Viewpoints

Since its introduction in the 1990's, Six Sigma hasThe Limited Use Of Six Sigma
become the buzzword in both the manufacturing andSix Sigma gained prominence as an effective quality
service industries. The various methodologies used inimprovement technique after it was successfully
Six Sigma are based on a disciplined and data drivenimplemented in Motorola. Since then, many large
approach that help in eliminating defects and achievingorganizations have implemented Six Sigma programs
near perfection by restricting the number of possibleand improved the quality of manufactured goods or
defects to less than 3.4 defects per million. Theservices rendered. However, the full potential of Six
methodologies are effective in managing businessSigma has not been realized so far because many
processes of both the manufacturing and servicecompetent small to medium level enterprises have still
industries. In manufacturing industries, the concepts andnot implemented Six Sigma programs. These
methodologies are used for reducing the number ofenterprises have all the resources to implement such
defects whereas in service industries, they are usedprograms, but are often wary of the final certification,
mainly for reducing transactional errors.as they believe that it is meant only for large
Although many companies have been successful inorganizations. These companies often do not realize
reducing the number of defects through Six Sigmathat Six Sigma delivers the same benefits to both
projects, the arguments raised against the efficacy oflarge as well as small business enterprises. The only
Six Sigma in all aspects of business processes still dodifference may be in the volume of goods
not seem to die down. Some management expertsmanufactured or services rendered.
think that Six Sigma is inherently flawed, as it does notThe Future Of Six Sigma
take into account the flaws that might be present inSix Sigma may appear similar to other quality
the system itself. They are of the opinion that themanagement tools such as TQM or Kaizen Events,
analytical and statistical tools used in Six Sigma onlybut in reality, it is quite different. Other quality
expose flaws in the execution and do not account formanagement programs often reach a stage after
a process that itself is riddled with defects.which no further quality improvements can be made.
Supporters of Six Sigma offer a different viewpoint.Six Sigma, on the other hand, is different as it focuses
According to them, quality management tools such ason taking quality improvement processes to the next
Total Quality Management (TQM) and Six Sigma arelevel. This means that Six Sigma has the potential to
conceptually quite similar except for their labels.outlast other quality management programs in the
Business organizations may use any of these forfuture.
improving overall quality. However, they often giveThe scope of Six Sigma is also much broader than
preference to Six Sigma as they believe that Sixother quality management programs as it can be
Sigma is more than just a process improvementapplied to every business process of an organization.
program and is based on concepts that focus onThe future is bright for Six Sigma programs with the
continuous quality improvements. They have thegrowing awareness in small and medium enterprises
opinion that Six Sigma concepts combine statisticalabout the potential benefits that can be derived from
measurement tools with contemporary managementimplementing such programs.
techniques for achieving extraordinary results.