Government Funding, Outsourcing, and Financial Decisions

The government is an agency that was mentioned acountries, because many countries have a hard time
lot in the assigned readings. I have some insight on thefinding labor. America is employing the world. On the
government and how it makes its IT decisions, and theother end, consumers have a hard time with
level of performance at which the government isoutsourcing, because currently, Americans are having
expected to follow. As far as shareholders and thea hard time finding labor as well. It is quite sad when
value of a company, outsourcing may or may notwe look at items purchased and they are made in
substantially increase or decrease shares. Investorsanother country. There has to be a way to put some
pay particular attention to the type of IT company, andsort of a cap on outsourcing, although many investors
the type of outsourcing in order to develop goodwill disagree.
reasoning. The question is, are standard financialWhy would an investor disagree with outsourcing?
investment information and criteria are all that isOutsourcing is a positive thing for any investor
needed to effectively evaluate IT outsourcingbecause it means more money for the company and
decisions? The answer in my opinion is yes and no.more money for the investor. It is actually quite simple.
Outsourcing is something that is not taken lightly. ThereWhen outsourcing though, a thorough financial analysis
are many steps involved when resorting toshould be conducted. After all, by outsourcing you are
outsourcing, and a strong management is critical. Ifsetting up an entire new company on the other side of
invested money is spent on an outside company andthe world. A company in debt may have a harder time
the company turns out to be a failure, people are losingoutsourcing, because investors may be more than
money, and are seeking your company for answers.careful. A company that has a lot of equity means
The government works a little differently than thethat they have money to back them in judgment. A
civilian sector, because of many reasons. Thecompany is saying that not only are they relying on
government has a strict budget to follow (most of theinvestors to pull them through, but they are relying on
time), however there are times that the budget meanstheir own funds as well. This shows that they are
nothing (i.e. war). For example, IT equipment that ismore than convinced that the company they are
needed for day to day operations on a CONUSoutsourcing to is not going to let them down.
military installation will have to coordinate with theirPerformance measurement is critical in outsourcing
resource advisors for funding. If the money is there,because it develops definitions for a company. By
and the equipment is indeed necessary, the equipmentanalyzing data, a company should be able to
is usually purchased. The different between a CONUSapproximate how much more money they will bring in
installation and an overseas-deployed environment iscompared to if they decided to keep jobs in the US
the budget itself. For example if an installation required(or whatever country the company originates). Initially
that same IT equipment as mentioned before, therethere are going to be some up-front costs, but I believe
are usually no questions asked, the equipment will bethat those up-front costs are covered rather quickly
purchased with funds, and if funds are not available (Iwith outsourcing.
am sure there are always funds available in aAre companies really doing the right thing by
deployed environment), they will be acquired someway.outsourcing? My answer is yes and no because like
When we are speaking about wartime contingencies,anything else, there are many sides of the equation. An
people's lives are at stake, and the US will doeconomic crisis can stem simply by lack of jobs and
whatever it has to, to make sure we have theresources. A solution to an economic crisis is to bring
equipment that we need at all times.more jobs back into the country. What does that
Outsourcing can have positive factors and negativemean for the companies - less profit. There is not a
factors. It depends how you look at outsourcing, andsingle company that is willing to bring jobs back to the
which end you are on (the operating end or theUS in order to benefit our country. If there were, they
consumer end). If you are on the operating end,would be setting a strong example. If a company says
outsourcing may benefit your company by savingthey would be willing to cut back on 10% of their total
money. I believe that is the bottom line with outsourcing.profits, and bring even 5,000 jobs into the country, they
Again, a company should be very particular whenwould be setting an example that I think others would
outsourcing, because the sub-contractor (outsourcedfollow as well.
company) is a direct reflection of your company.The bottom line is that money is money, and no matter
According to CNN, the following popular IT companieshow much of it a company has, they always want
outsource labor: Microsoft, Apple, Sun Microsystems,more. Most Americans dream to own a small business,
IBM, Cisco Systems, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, andto own their own house, pay their own bills, and to be
Gateway. Keep in mind these are just a handful of theself-reliable. Once a business takes off, it is hard to
many companies that send jobs overseas to earnstop.
maximum profits. Outsourcing is great for overseas