Merger Failures, Value Destruction and Cultural Conflicts - And How to Avoid Them!

To fully understand merger failures we need tosuggests that cultural incompatibility is the single largest
understand the motivation behind M&A activity -cause of merger failures. According to Bibler the
which is primarily about the creation of value bydifficulty of blending two organisations lies in the fact
exploiting [what is euphemistically referred to as]that each group tends to see the world through its
synergies.own biased cultural filters, which he refers to as
Technically speaking, "synergy" is defined as the"familiarity blindness" or "cultural trance", and this cannot
increase in the merging firms' competitive strengthsbe overemphasised as a cause of merger failures.
and resulting cash flows beyond which the twoA very personal perspective...
companies are expected to accomplish independently.What really bothers me is the way the system
The word "synergy" entered merger vocabulary duringcurrently works for remunerating all of the professional
the 1960s merger wave, and was used to describeadvisors who provide services to the corporate world.
gains from conglomerate mergers that could not beI would welcome the day when professional advisors
readily identified, but were presumed to be present toand senior executives have a significant part of their
explain why the mergers occurred.large remuneration linked to the medium term [i.e.3-5
If it were not for the catastrophic failure rate of mostyears] shareholder value they created - cos I
mergers and the destruction of shareholder value and,somehow feel that might go a long way to redefining
most importantly, the human cost, then this could bethe whole concept of "synergy" and reducing the
amusing. But to my mind it isn't, it is an appallingpercentage of merger failures.
indictment of the business world and their advisors thatExcuse the lateral thinking for a moment - but can you
[just as in the world of change management] 70% ofimagine civil engineers or construction companies or
all M&A activity fail to realise the intended benefits.the people who build nuclear power stations - working
There have been endless studies over the past 30on the same basis - where a 70% failure rate was
years to explore the reason for merger successesaccepted? Can you? So why on earth should the
and merger failures. The overwhelming evidence isworld of business be any different?
that over 70% of the time, mergers do not createWhy does this bother me? Quite simply, because of
synergies and shareholders of both companiesthe very considerable, unnecessary, and totally
involved do not see gains in shareholder value.avoidable human cost.
According to a survey published by KPMG in 2008, theSo How to avoid these risks of merger failures...
proportion of M&A deals that have reduced valueThe best way to avoid these merger failure reasons is
has increased by 50 percent in the two years sinceto conduct a "soft" due diligence audit, focusing on the
their previous survey. Culture remains one of the tophuman resources aspects of the merger to identify (1)
post deal challenges with companies continuing to linkcultural difference and issues to be faced, and (2) the
post deal HR challenges with cultural complexity.impacts on those people who are going to be most
Greatest risks to merger success are all peopleaffected, and those people who are critical to the
related.success of the merger.
A survey conducted by A.T. Kearney in 2004 toAnd as my contribution to all this, I have developed a
identify the most critical phase to merger success ordiagnostic process that allows a company to test the
merger failures, revealed that whilst the majority ofimpact of a proposed business initiative or venture on
53% stressed that the actual implementation phase -those people most affected by it, to identify why it
often referred to as the "post-merger integration"may fail and to establish precisely what has got to be
phase - bears the greatest risk - this post-acquisitiondone to make it a success.
phase is the most ignored.This tool can be applied to a proposed merger as part
In a study of 40 British companies, Cartright andof the HR due diligence process, to identify and
Cooper [1995] reported that all 40 conducted a detailedassess the cultural issues that will be encountered. The
financial and legal audit of the company they intendedtool is sufficiently flexible and scalable to be adapted,
to acquire, but that not even one of these samemodified or enhanced to meet a specific requirement.
companies made any attempt to carry out an audit ofIt is low tech and simple to understand and apply, it
the company's human resources and culture to assessinvolves staff at any or all levels and enables them to
the challenges concerning integration of thearticulate difficult issues in a non-confrontational way,
organization they were acquiring.and it can be undertaken quickly and before large
A brief review of many business and academicsums of money are irrevocably committed to the
studies into the factors impacting merger failuresproposed merger.
reveals the greatest risk of merger failure existed inThe output of this process forms the input for the
the area of people issues, and proposes the value ofcreation of a programme management based
a "soft" due diligence audit focusing on humanapproach to managing the change management and
resources to identify cultural difference and issues toHR related aspects of post merger integration
be faced and impacts on those people who are criticalaspects.
to the success of the merger.For more on this: " Avoiding merger failures "
Dominic Fong of Curtin Business School said: "OneI invite you to take advantage of my 7 FREE "How to
critical factor that befalls a merger is cultural conflicts....".Do It" downloads that will take you through all of the
T.J Tetenhaum describes culture "as the heart of akey stages of " How to manage change " - and show
merger integration". Another writer Richard S. Bibleryou how to manage successfully.