Operational Transparency - A Business Ethics Path to Competitive Advantage

Firms, and the managers within them, are alwayscommitments become the foundation for bonus goals
looking for that next source of advantage over theand budgets. This information is then becomes the
competition, while at the same time struggling tostrategic operations plan shared across the
address current internal inefficiencies, conflicts, andorganization to those who "need to know", and
performance issues. Having one foot in the present tobecomes the core performance management and
address the issues of the day, while planning andaccountability agenda for regular (weekly/monthly)
preparing for a successful future, is a constantmanagement, team, and employee meetings and a
dilemma facing today's manager.key measure for evaluating alternatives in the
Historically, transparency has been seen more as andecision-making process..
ethics practice for third party analysis of an institution'sTransparency in Decision-making and Change
finances and practices; however, the moreManagement
widespread study of business ethics and organizationalThe visible outcomes of decision-making at all levels
behavior is pointing to operational transparency as aare very telling about the firm's and individual
management practice that can both address thosemanagers' values and priorities. Although not all
daily management issues, and also become an internalstrategic decisions can be played out in a public forum
source of sustainable competitive advantage that isfor competitive and confidentiality reasons, the
difficult for competitors to imitate.outcomes of those decisions (changes to
This article will explore the concept of operationalorganizational structure, design, resource allocation,
transparency and suggest management practices inproduct direction etc.) should be communicated as
the areas of strategy development andthoroughly as possible including the rationale and criteria
implementation, decision-making, and performancebehind the decision to help employees understand the
management to achieve transparency, improvedecision and make a better connection between the
performance. and create a source of sustainablefirm's espoused values and those used to make
competitive advantage.important decisions. Additionally, those decisions related
Transparencyto changes to organizational policy, procedures, and
Transparency is a trust building mechanism generallysystems should be folded into a change management
used to "open up" the books or practices of anprocess that provides transparency to how the
organization to stakeholders with a "right to know".decisions are made, provides for functional area input,
Much has been written about transparency in publicand thus builds stronger trust and commitment to both
companies and governments, but even with themanagement and the decision outcomes.
importance of trust in all business transactions andA best practice in transparent change management
relationships, little is published about how to use thissystems begins with executive support and devotes
trust building mechanism to improve organizationalan administrator to act as a conduit for proposed
performance at the operational level. When employeeschanges and facilitate a monthly meeting with leaders
know the true how and why behind organizationalof the various functions (internal stakeholders) to
strategy, decision-making, and performancereview executive summaries of the proposed
management, they generally feel more trust towardchanges and approve or deny the proposed changes
the management of their organization and thus canbased on the business merit and impacts on internal
become more committed and engaged in their work.and external stakeholders. The approved changes
Although fear of strategic information falling intothen move to a more operationally focused group of
competitors' hands from internal sources can limit theinternal stakeholders to discuss at a more detailed level
potential for complete transparency, strategic sharinghow the changes would impact their function and
and coordination of key internal operating informationidentify the tactical plans and resources necessary to
can create trust in the system and a knowledge ofschedule and implement the changes as smoothly as
how each player contributes and is impacted by thepossible. The executive summaries and outcomes are
system. The creation and requirement forcommunicated to the internal stakeholders and
transparency and sharing of information in strategy,maintained on an internal website that provides
decision-making and performance managementemployees with a quick glance summary and detailed
establishes an environment where goals, and theinformation about coming changes and plans. This type
resources and behaviors used to achieve them, canof system demystifies the origin, rationale, and content
be aligned for greater cooperation and performance.of change, ensures involvement and coordination and
Transparency in Strategyin essence makes change management a transparent
Drawing from the resource-based view of strategyprocess rather than an unpredictable event.
(See Barney 1991) and the concept of strategicTransparency in Performance Management
leadership (See Ireland & Hitt, 2001), managers canThe translation of high level strategies into cascading
build a competitive advantage by doing a better job ofgoals and performance management has been
choosing between competing alternatives and aligningaddressed in models such as Management by
internal resources than their competitors. At a high levelObjective (MBO) and the Balanced Scorecard.
this breaks down to openly communicating and aligningHowever, a primary goal of transparency in
organizational priorities, visibility to functional areaperformance management is to achieve visibility,
contributions to those priorities to those who need toalignment, and accountability across the organization's
know, and a visible connection between eachgoals and objectives. This is achieved through the
employee's work activities and those organizationalstrategy process above where the quality and quantity
priorities.of inputs and outputs required by each of the internal
However, this is not solely an executive concern, butstakeholders to make their contribution to the overall
instead, each manager and employee is critical to thisfirm goals are negotiated and translated into single
strategy's success, and it can be implemented solely atowner outputs. These negotiated goals form the basis
the functional or team level in the absence offor performance evaluation and goal vs. actual
organizational support. However, when each manageroutcome become a priority agenda item at the weekly
and employee understands the organization's prioritiesmanagement, team, and one on one employee
and has specific information about how they contributemeetings so that issues threatening the agreed upon
to them, and those contributions are directly alignedoutput can be addressed proactively and teams can
with related contributions firms, can achieve improvedwork internally and across functions to address both
teamwork and performance.challenges and opportunities related to meeting and
Transparency in strategy can be achieved at any time,improving the related performance. The transparency
but the best starting point is during the annual planningto the specific goals and outcomes and active
and budget creation cycle, specifically whenmanagement and communication of those results
executives and managers are submitting goals to bereduces role ambiguity and negative conflict and
eligible for quarterly bonuses. All too often, this criticalcreates a high performance environment where
time passes with a rush of activity, but little sharing ofemployees can feel that their contributions are being
information or coordination from above or amongfairly evaluated against their performance
functional area managers. The worst case result is aexpectations, and those of their colleagues.
broad range of unrelated or conflicting goals that doConclusion
not reflect the organization's stated or unstatedLeaders who can build trust and commitment among
priorities.their employees through effective management
A best case scenario would have executives outliningpractices have a definite source of competitive
the key priorities and performance objectives as aadvantage. This article briefly discussed some actions
team, and then negotiating each functional area'sfirms can take to make their key value creation
contributions to those outcomes. Critical to the successprocesses more transparent and effective. Through
of this negotiation is single ownership of goals and firmthe creation of transparent systems and processes
commitments from each manager about the inputsfor strategy development, decision-making, and
they will provide to the others as a result. A generalperformance management, firms can not only achieve
example of this would be an organizational priority ofhigher levels of performance through alignment and
increasing sales by 20%, a sales goal of 1000 units peraccountability, but also achieve higher levels of trust
month, and operations committing to processing theand commitment from employees who will be able to
requisite number of sales files to a set standard eachbetter understand and participate cooperatively in the
month. The same process is followed for projectspursuit of the firm's values and priorities in daily
falling outside the core business operations, and theseoperations.