"I Am Not A Number" - Why Too Many Change Projects Fail

Many of you will recognise this quote from the 1960sorganisation as a machine that needs to be
TV show, "The Prisoner". Patrick McGoohan used the"re-engineered". The problems created by this
phrase to describe his frustration at not being treatedapproach are then treated as "people issues".
as an individual, and being kept in the dark about whatProcesses and people cannot be separated like this.
his superiors were up to in a very confusingEven in this age of technology, the vast majority of
environment. This experience is not dissimilar to whatbusiness processes are carried out by people - usually
employees face in most change projects.informally.
A cog in the machineIt is what employees do on a day-to-day basis that
Traditional approaches to business change andmakes a business work. A large percentage of the
process improvement have at their heart, the idea thatprocesses are not documented and are so complex
a business is, essentially, a machine that can bethat it would be almost impossible to do so.
engineered to be efficient. In fact the term "BusinessProcedures manuals are a very conceptualised view
Process Re-engineering" (BPR) makes this assumptionof business processes - if they could capture
quite explicit.everything, no-one would pay for experience.
This "mechanical" approach to change can leaveOnce you acknowledge this, it becomes quite clear
employees feeling alienated and devalued (much likewhy most change projects are unsuccessful. A
Patrick McGoohan).business process is not an inanimate object that can
As these traditional approaches have developed, morebe "re-engineered" but a collection of human
emphasis has been placed on the "human" aspects. Itbehaviours. The only people capable of changing the
is acknowledged that a change programme cannotbusiness processes are those carrying them out.
work without "employee buy-in". The issue is usuallyProcess Improvement for Strategic Objectives
tackled by running numerous workshops where(PISO®)
consultants try to make the employees feel part ofPISO®, developed at the University of Sunderland,
the exercise, while continuing to apply the same oldis a unique approach to business process
techniques to the business processes themselves.improvement that provides a structured step-by-step
From the employee's point of view, an externalapproach for the employees themselves to re-design
consultant has interviewed him for thirty minutes totheir own processes.
understand the job that he has been doing for thirtyAt Feechan Consulting Ltd, we work with organisations
years, gone away and come back with a new way oflarge and small throughout the UK, from public sector
doing it. This comes across as patronising at best. Thebodies such as the BBC and North Tyneside Council
consultant then rubs salt into the wounds by runningto private sector companies across all sectors.
workshops to try to win the employee over so that heMany of our clients learn the technique on one of our
does not obstruct the changes!training courses and then apply it themselves, whereas
In this environment, addressing the "people issues" is allothers require our facilitation. Either way, it is the
about ensuring that the level of disillusionment is not soemployees that carry out the processes that redesign
great that the change project fails.them, removing the separation of people and
Processes vs Peopleprocesses and significantly improving the success of
These problems are created because the underlyingany change.
approach to the business processes is still to treat the