| ITIL is the accepted service management service | | | | In the past, whoever was handling incidents could only |
| framework for best practices for the provision of | | | | see the incidents; whoever was handling the problems |
| Information Technology services and is a basis for | | | | would only see the problems. There was not an |
| aligning business needs with IT. | | | | integrated approach and implementing ITIL version 2 |
| ITIL was established by the UK government and is | | | | was quite easy to do. However, if you view ITIL as a |
| currently in its 3rd version. It places a framework | | | | framework, Version 3 makes it more difficult to fall into |
| around common sense practices, giving people | | | | a single process mindset. Version 3 diagrams are |
| guidelines on the areas they should focus on. | | | | more inter-related and easier for people to see the |
| Previous versions of ITIL differ from version 3 in that | | | | overlap in functions and processes. |
| they had more of a silo approach to process areas | | | | From the ITIL framework, most of the tools that are |
| such as an incident, problem, change, service level, | | | | available try to address the integrated areas of |
| release and availability. What ITIL service desk | | | | management. Many products are certified to ITIL and |
| practitioners found was that many people remained in | | | | Pink Elephant is one such organisation that verifies |
| their own silo and did not integrate all aspects required | | | | products support the ITIL framework. However, ITIL is |
| to make managing IT a common sense process. For | | | | not proscriptive - it doesn't specify that you need to do |
| example, many only performed incident management, | | | | this like this. One of the problems people have when |
| some only problem management. | | | | they try to implement ITIL is that they expect to be |
| The intention of ITIL is that everything inter-relates and | | | | able to pick up a book and say "if I want to manage |
| integrates - you don't just perform incident | | | | change within my organisation using ITIL, this is what I |
| management and then leave the remaining aspects of | | | | have to do". ITIL doesn't do that. It is a framework of |
| customer service to someone else. Version 3 | | | | best practice and it is expected that you take what |
| attempts to better formalise integration of the services | | | | you need to make sure that it runs smoothly for your |
| that IT provides to the business. It is much more | | | | organisation. |
| focused on what the business requires of IT and | | | | There's no right or wrong way to implement ITIL. What |
| focuses on what services IT is providing to the | | | | that means is that every tool that you look at will be |
| business. | | | | slightly different. There's no prescriptive way of doing |
| Today, most businesses these days can't operate | | | | things, and each tool has its own suggested way. The |
| without IT, but IT need to be seen to be providing the | | | | tools do go a certain way towards suggesting how |
| right service to the business. ITIL Version 3 is more | | | | you can manage the various processes, but there's |
| service focused and advises that organisations should | | | | always an element of needing to fit in with your |
| be agreeing with the business about what services | | | | organisation, within your business practices. This is |
| they need IT to provide; then look how to implement | | | | where tool selection becomes important. You need a |
| the right processes - changing and improving those | | | | tool that is very flexible, because you don't want to |
| processes based on feedback from the business. | | | | mould your processes to the tool - you want to be |
| Version 2 processes are still a primary part of ITIL as | | | | able to adjust the tool to your processes. |
| you will continue to manage incidents and problems, | | | | This comes down to time and money. If you don't |
| and manage change requests from the business. | | | | have time and money then you can take a tool off the |
| However, today, the silo approach has been removed | | | | shelf and be happy with what it does. With time and |
| and there is more overlap so that people can see how | | | | money you can adjust the service management |
| they should be passing incidents, problems, changes | | | | software tool to your process. |
| and resolutions along the customer service chain. | | | | |