Six Sigma Vs ISO 9000

The debate over whether or not to choose Six Sigmaactivities with the vision of the leader of the company.
over ISO 9000 is getting more interesting with eachThe approach is "how to" rather than "what to" deliver.
passing day. In an attempt to determine which of theseThe ISO 9000 Approach
is the better of the two, it is highly pertinent to discussThe ISO approach towards quality management
that in the context of applicability of them to industries.concentrates on standardization of the activities of
And there exists a huge amount of differenceproduction. The eight quality principles of ISO 9000,
between the approaches of these two methodologiesalong with its twenty-four requirements outline business
in tackling the issues.processes. The emphasis here is on the control of
Six Sigma - A Critical Viewevents in each aspect of doing business by
Six Sigma utilizes a multi-faceted approach to doingdocumenting evidence and reports. The eight principles
business with total improvement of the end productof ISO 9000 include prioritizing customer data,
being the goal. In doing so, Six Sigma defines andpurchasing and quality systems, among other critical
analyzes the processes critically almost alwaysaspects. ISO 9000 recognizes each process, whose
focusing on process improvements. The statisticalend goals are the same, as an independent entity.
tools used in Six Sigma help not just in the adoption ofDocumented quality requirements typically decide,
processes but are also critical tools of Six Sigmabased on set rules, whether or not a particular process
implementation.adhered to that standard.
Process Development StagesDocument and Process Control
Let us examine the above statement as applicable toMaintenance of quality is achieved by adhering to key
a process for easier understanding. While working onprocess and document control. Operating procedures
process improvement, the Black Belts break up theand process control documents restrict deviations
original sequence of different events that comprise theoutside the concepts of what you should be doing in
entire process and each event is further subdividedevery process. What-you-should-be-doing is given
internally. This enables the "belts" to take an entirelyemphasis under standard conditions rather than dealing
different view of the process via the entire process aswith process improvement.
a whole. The powerful statistical tools employed at thisStalwarts in industry are examining the possibility of
stage of evaluation make the picture clearer and helpmerging the best practices of the two. Several
the "belts" to arrive at decisions about the valueindustry leaders have already acknowledged the
additions those made to the process by differentbenefits of using both methodologies to compliment
events.each other. Another view is that, as Six Sigma
This principle obviously goes beyond standardizing theimplementation is what you do within your company
processes and setting the pathway for being vigilant(unlike the certification in ISO) the company does not
about adherence to the Six Sigma methodology.get recognition for achieving successful Six Sigma
Useless values which have lost meaning make wayimplementation. However, as long as the culmination of
for more meaningful events and eventually morea business activity is defined by both methodologies as
robust and comprehensive processes. In a Six Sigmaretaining and improving the customer base along with
environment, customer demands will assume a keymaximizing the bottom line, rejection of one in favor of
role in driving the processes towards aligning allother will be hard to justify.