Struggle For the Operational Excellence

In today's competitive world each company isthat problem should be identified and the problem
constantly trying to achieve the competitive advantageshould be addressed. If at all any dashboard is needed
through various means. Changing the external factorsfor monitoring purposes than it should be an
like market demand, customer choice, creating entryautomated process with no human intervention with
barriers, etc. are not easy, therefore, companies lookdata taken from an independent source.
internally to create efficiencies, eliminate waste,What can be improved vs. what needs to be
enhance productivity, etc. etc. This leads to creation ofimproved
what in most companies is called Quality or Six SigmaIn my experience it is a normal practice for any quality
function/department. Almost every company of thefunction to highlight improvement ideas implemented by
modern world has such department that tries to inventvarious people in the organisation. These improvement
the success formula for the company. Most CEOsideas could be small impact or big impact ideas and
would rely very heavy on the quality function and arethese could get originated and implemented in any
willing to invest money to get the edge in the marketdepartment be it Marketing, Customer Service,
over competitors and treat it part of the company'sOperations, Finance, HR, etc. Quality function would
survival strategy.flash these ideas with their stamp on it and would
After having spent some years in the operations of ainvest huge amount of time in showcasing these to the
few companies and having looked at the practicesmanagement. Many rewards and recognition schemes
followed by the quality functions, I get the feeling thatare launched to motivate employees to think about
this function in most cases and in most companies areimprovement that are lower hanging fruits and
overrated. I also feel that blind faith is held on therepository is created for the best practice sharing.
working of this department and a little effort is madeYou must be thinking that this sounds like a good thing
to measure their success objectively. Claims ofto do for any organisation and what could possibly be
savings made or efficiencies achieved are not seen inwrong with this. My biggest disconnect on this is that all
the financial statements of the company or any otherthese efforts are focused on what can be improved
external parameter like market share. The claimsand this normally does not help much in improving that
made in most cases are for the future potentialneeds improvement from the customers' perspective.
savings that can not be verified whether those claimsTime, effort and energy spend on managing and
materialised in reality. Senior management getsshowcasing 'what can be improved' can never
mesmerised with the jargons and statistical enigmaachieve the expectation that quality function would
created and go with the faith that these are tried andhelp in achieving operational excellence. My view is that
tested techniques and they must be getting benefitswhatever can be improved will eventually get
somewhere. In case of service industries like BPO, IT,improved, however, the trick is in identifying the gaps
consulting, etc. these tools and techniques are alsobetween service delivery and customer expectations
pitched as unique selling proposition. However, I am notand then thinking and implementing ideas that would
sure whether any company of the modern world hasbridge those gaps. Such process can only provide
been successful in carrying out a cost benefit analysisanswer to a known internal problem in performing an
with tangible benefits seen out of this function.activity by an employee; however, it can not help even
While I am of the view that most companies of thein identifying any fundamental gaps in the customer
modern era are not able to see the tangible benefitsservice delivery vs. customer expectation.
out of quality function, I am not saying that the qualityInternal focus
tools and techniques like six-sigma are ineffective.I have seen many CEOs making a statement that
These tools make perfect theoretical sense howeverremoving fat and wasteful expenditure in the company
the flaws in the approach with which these tools arewill help them improve its margin and enhance
applied by most quality functions make these toolsshareholders' value. This is an excellent example of
ineffective. In this article I am trying highlight some oflooking internally for the success. There is no doubt
the basis flaws in the approach that the qualitythat every company has certain level of wasteful
functions of most companies suffer from and drawexpenditure but it is equally true that there are areas
attention to the risk associated with excessive reliancewhere a company may not have spent as much as
placed by many CEOs on quality functions in theirthey should have as investment for future growth.
struggle to accomplish the operational excellence.One such example could be desire to have top talent
Management by dashboardretention but salary benchmarking at industry average.
I have seen many companies suffering from thisThe moment company start to look at internally for
syndrome and this is something that is propagated bycost savings then there is a low possibility that the
the most quality functions. The punch line is 'somethingcompany would make any effort to identify the areas
that can not be measured can not be improved'. I havewhere corners are getting cut jeopardising its growth
many issues with this syndrome. Anything that goespotential.
wrong once, the simple solution offered is to have aIn today's world where companies have sophisticated
dashboard to monitor it constantly to ensure that itand online accounting, budgeting system and MIS
does not go wrong again. This is implemented with littlesystems; management reports are prepared and
realisation that the time spent by different people in thereviewed on monthly basis it is hard to believe that
organisation to create that dashboard will eat into thethere could be enough fat to significantly impact a
available productive hours. There is no attempt madecompany's profitability. There is a danger that
to find out how much it costs to have a dashboard.company may get into a vicious cycle of taking money
For companies with different divisions or branches,out from areas which could impact their long term
these dashboards are prepared from the lowest levelgrowth. Loss of good talent to the competition can
and then consolidated at various levels. If we look athappen fairly quickly.
the cost of dashboard based on time spend byI think elimination of wasteful expenditure should be
number of people on annulised basis then one will bedriven as a culture in the company. Company's policies,
able to realise whether or not it is worth the effort. Iprocesses, communications, etc. that outline a
notice that quality function proposing a dashboardcompany's culture should stress upon the point that
completely ignore the cost attached to itscompany seeks for value of its money and
implementation. I think in most cases these costs areemployees should as discreet in spending the
assumed to be zero. I have seen instances wherecompany's as they would while spending their own
people have missed the customer service deliverymoney. It only rarely happens that a recommendation
because they were busy completing a dashboard.is made from the quality department to the senior
Imagine if it happens in a company on a broader levelmanagement stating that company is under spending
then its implications could be disastrous.on a specific area and that may impact its future
The other reason that is normally given for having agrowth or is impacting customer service delivery.
dashboard apart from monitoring a process or activityThe genesis of my article is that quality or six sigma
is that dashboards with the comparative informationtools are excellent tools and are very much relevant in
drives internal competition and therefore helps intoday's context. However, the approach and practices
achieving operational excellence. This concept ofbeing used by the quality functions of most companies
internal competition starts the practice of what I callare driving behaviour of management by dashboard,
"dashboard management". People at different leveldashboard management, improve what can be
think of all the possible tricks of the world to manipulateimproved and too much internal focus. These
the numbers that will get flashed in the comparativeapproach and practices are probably doing more harm
dashboard. This again leads to valuable time andthan providing value that senior management aspires
resources getting wasted on dashboard managementto derive out of this function. There is a need to
that should ideally be used in performing the tasks thatevaluate and assess the cost benefit of each
add value to the company's top line and bottom line.recommendation or suggestion made by them rather
The cumulative amounts of time spend in somethan having a blind faith on its effectiveness. There is a
organisations in creating, consolidating, reviewing andneed to shift the focus from internal to external, from
managing these dashboards have now reached to theinput to output and from waste elimination to
level of insanity.investment for growth to achieve real operational
In my view a dashboard is not the answer to anyexcellence.
problem. If a problem is detected then root cause of