Symantec research reveals IT spending more on Disaster Recovery

Symantec research reveals IT spending more on- Disruption to employees (44 percent)
Disaster Recovery Symantec Corp. announced the- Budget (44 percent)
global results of its fifth annual IT Disaster Recovery- Disruption to customers (40 percent) Also a concern
survey, which demonstrates rising DR pressures onis that more organizations reported that disaster
organizations caused by soaring downtime costs andrecovery testing increasingly impacts customers and
more stringent IT service level requirements to mitigaterevenue over previous years. Forty percent of
risk to the business. The study also shows that whilerespondents reported that disaster recovery testing
DR budgets are higher in 2009, they are expected towill impact their organizations' customers and nearly
remain flat over the next few years – requiring ITone third (27 percent) reported that such testing could
professionals to do more with the same or less. thatimpact their organization's sales and revenue.
while recovery time objectives were reduced to 4Symantec recommends that organizations implement
hours in 2009, disaster recovery testing anddisaster recovery testing methods that can be run
virtualization are still major challenges for organizations.frequently and without disruption to business
Respondents report that DR testing increasinglyoperations. Symantec believes that people and
impacts customers and revenue, and one in four testsprocesses are the main reason tests fail, pointing to
fail. Nearly a third of organizations don't test virtualthe need for more automation. 
environments as part of their disaster recovery plans,Virtualization still a major challenge
and a slightly larger percentage of virtual environmentsSixty-four percent of worldwide respondents reported
aren't regularly backed up – pointing to the need forthat virtualization is causing them to reevaluate their
more automation and cross-environment tools. disaster recovery plans. This is up from 55 percent in
Downtime costs are significant2008. Still, nearly a third (27 percent) of organizations
The average cost of executing/implementing disasterdo not test virtual environments as part of their
recovery plans for each downtime incident worldwidedisaster recovery initiatives. This number has improved
according to respondents is US $287,600. In Northin the past year, lowering from more than one-third (35
America, the median cost can climb to as high aspercent) of organizations who did not test in 2008.
$900,000. Globally, this number is highest for healthcareAdditionally, more than one-third (36 percent) of data
and financial services organizations. In North America,on virtualized systems is not regularly backed up,
the median cost for financial institutions is $650,000. showing no improvement in the past year (37 percent
This is alarming when one considers that one in fourin 2008). Over half of the respondents cited lack of
tests failed and 93 percent of organizations have hadbackup storage capacity and automated recovery
to execute on their disaster recovery plans.tools as top challenges to protecting data in virtual
Respondents reported that it takes on average threeenvironments. 
hours to achieve skeleton operations after an outage,In addition, the study found that globally, more than half
and four hours to be up and running. This isof respondents cited:
dramatically improved over the 2008 findings, where- Lack of storage management tools as the top
only three percent of respondents reported that theychallenge in protecting mission critical data and
could achieve skeleton operations within 12 hours, andapplications in virtual environments (53 percent)
31 percent believed they would have baseline- Resource constraints such as people, budget, and
operations within one day. space as the top challenges to backing up virtual
2009 DR spending bucks trendmachines suggesting a need for greater automation
The research shows that the annual median budgetand the ability to leverage existing IT investments in
for disaster recovery initiatives, including backup,order to lower costs (51 percent)
recovery, clustering, archiving, spare servers, replication,Recommendations
tape, services, disaster recovery plan developmentAs demonstrated over multiple years of this study,
and offsite costs at data centers surveyed is $50lack of resources continues to be an issue, yet the
million. According to respondents, this number willcosts of downtime are staggering. Organizations can
continue to grow throughout 2009, but more than halfalso do a better job at curbing the costs of downtime
(52 percent) of respondents believe that budgets willby implementing more automation tools that minimize
be flat in 2010, making it more challenging for IThuman involvement and address other weaknesses in
management to better leverage their assets includingtheir disaster recovery plans.
hardware, software and personnel.Because disaster recovery testing is invaluable, but
Executive involvement doubled in past yearcan significantly impact business – including
According to the 2009 disaster recovery survey, 70customers and revenue – organizations should seek
percent of respondents reported that their disasterto improve the success of testing by evaluating and
recovery committees involved the CIO, CTO or ITimplementing testing methods which are
director – a significant increase from last year'snon-disruptive. 
research where 33 percent of respondents indicatedFinally, organizations should include those responsible
executive involvement. As budgets increased over thefor virtualization into disaster recovery plans, especially
past year, disaster recovery initiatives have becometesting and backup initiatives. Virtual environments
more of a competitive differentiator, and impact ofshould be treated the same as a physical server,
downtown on customers is greater than ever. Anothershowing the need for organizations to adopt more
reason for executive involvement is the increase ofcross-platform and cross-environment tools, or
applications that are seen as mission critical. Sixtystandardizing on fewer platforms. 
percent of applications were deemed mission critical"This year's Symantec-sponsored research clearly
by respondents, and nearly the same amount isidentifies key issues, hidden risks and best practices in
covered in disaster recovery plans. Any sort ofimplementing DR. While some aspects are trending
outage to these systems will have an enormouswell, the impact of downtime is greater than ever
impact to the business.before," said Rob Soderbery, senior vice president of
Disaster recovery testing improves but still a majorSymantec's Storage and Availability Management
challengeGroup. "The surging cost of downtime places greater
This year, 35 percent of respondents reported thatemphasis on business – which means more
they test their DR plans once per year or lesspressure on IT. If organizations are not protecting virtual
frequently – a 12 percent improvement from lastenvironments, not testing their DR plans and seeing
year. In addition, one in four tests still fail, showing aone out every four tests fail then something needs to
dramatic need for improvement in this area. Reasonschange to better manage risk to the business.
most respondents cited for why organizations aren'tOrganizations should implement solutions that address
testing include:these needs while allowing them to leverage existing
- Lack of resources in terms of people's time (48assets.
percent)