The DMAIC Method in Six Sigma

The Six Sigma DMAIC process methodology is avarious process improvement scenarios and determine
system that brings measurable and significantwhich has the best net benefit impact to the company.
improvement to existing processes that are fallingA common error people make when they discuss Six
below specifications. The DMAIC methodology can beSigma is thinking that the DMAIC process takes too
used when a product or process is in existence atlong to achieve improvements. This is far from the
your company but is not meeting customertruth. Quick improvements are often achieved early in
specification or is otherwise not performing adequately.the project and frequently already implemented by the
DMAIC is an acronym for five interconnected phases:time the team reaches the Analyze phase. If the team
* Define the project goals and deliverables for bothhas not already identified major improvements, then
internal and external customersthe breakthrough often results from careful process
* Measure the process to determine currentanalysis with data. Six Sigma analysis techniques are
performancevaluable tools to uncover more difficult solutions.
* Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of theStep Four Improve
defectsThe Improve phase is where the process transitions
* Improve the process by eliminating defectsinto solutions. Critical inputs have been verified and
* Control future process performanceoptimized toward nailing down the problem causes.
Step One: DefineOnce problem causes are determined in the Analyze
In the Define phase, the Six Sigma project teamphase, the team finds, evaluates through testing, and
identifies a project for improvement based on businessselects creative new improvement solutions. The team
objectives and the needs and requirements of theidentifies and quantifies what will happen if needed
customers. Six Sigma is about "solving a problem withimprovements are not made and what will happen if
an unknown solution." To unearth the solution, thethe improvements take too long. This develops a cost
problem needs to first be defined in concretebenefit analysis. More often than not simple process
measurable terms. The team identifies critical-to-qualityexperimentation and simulation bring the team big gains
(CTQ) characteristics that have the most impact onin this step. Also at the Improve stage, the team
quality-separating the "vital few" from the "trivial many."develops an implementation plan with a change
With the CTQs identified the team can create a mapmanagement approach that will assist the organization
of the process to be improved with defined andin implementing and adapting to the solutions and the
measurable, deliverables, and goals.changes that will result from them.
Step Two: MeasureStep Five: Control
In the Measure phase, the team begins with the properSuccess in the Control phase depends upon how well
metrics. Critical measures that are necessary tothe team did in the previous four phases. The keys are
evaluate the success of the project are identified anda solid monitoring plan with proper change
determined. The initial capability and stability of themanagement methods that identify key stakeholders.
project is determined in order to establish aLessons learned are now implemented and tools are
measurement baseline. Valid and reliable metrics toput in place to ensure that the key variables remain
monitor the progress of the project are establishedwithin the acceptable ranges over time so that
during the Measure phase; input, process, and outputprocess improvement gains are maintained. The team
indicators are identified. Once the project has a cleardevelops a project hand off process, reaction plans,
definition with a clear measurable set of indicators, theand training materials to guarantee performance and
process is studied to determine the Key Processlong-term project savings. Documenting the project is
Steps and an operational plan defined to measure thevery important so that the new procedures and
indicators. Potential impacts on CTQs from each inputlessons learned are maintained and provide concrete
are considered with respect to the defects currentlyexamples for the organization. At the close of the
generated in the process. Key Inputs are prioritized toControl phase, ownership and knowledge is
establish a short list to study in more detail and totransferred to the process owner and process team
determine the potential ways the process could gotasked with the responsibilities. Finally, the team
wrong. Once the reasons for input failure areidentifies what the next steps are for future Six Sigma
determined, preventative action plans are put intoprocess improvement opportunities by identifying
place.replication and standardizations opportunities and plans.
Step Three: AnalyzeStep Six: Synergize
Through the Analyze phase, the team can determineThis extra step is to ensure the gains a Six Sigma
the causes of the problem that needs improvementTeam has made are shared with the organization as a
and how to eliminate the gap between existingwhole. This sharing is needed to help create a learning
performance and the desired level of performance.organization. Integrating and institutionalizing the lessons
This involves discovering why defects are generatedlearned and the improvements made multiply the real
by identifying the key variables that are most likely togains generated by the Six Sigma project. A Six
create process variation. As the Six Sigma teamSigma project should not be an isolated process. It is
moves through the Analyze stage and subsequentnot the end but just the beginning.
Improve stage of the process they will discover